| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Matthews v Kent and Medway Towns Fire Authority ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Matthews v Kent and Medway Towns Fire Authority
''Matthews v Kent & Medway Towns Fire Authority'' () (UKHL 8 ) is a UK labour law case concerning discrimination of part-time workers, and justifications.
==Facts==
Part and full-time fire fighters were being paid differently, and claimed unlawful discrimination under the PTWR 2000. Full-time firefighters responded to emergencies and were engaged in educational, preventive and administrative tasks, while part-time firefighters did not do the administrative work.
The Employment Tribunal held that the full-time firefighters fell under regulation 2(3)(a) and the part-time firefighters under regulation 2(3)(d), nor did they do broadly similar work under regulation 4(a)(ii). The EAT upheld the Tribunal. The Court of Appeal〔() ICR 84〕 held that they had had the same kind of contract under regulation 2(3), because the categories were meant to be mutually exclusive. However, the appeal was still dismissed because the firefighters did not do the same or broadly similar work under regulation 4(a).
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Matthews v Kent and Medway Towns Fire Authority」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|